Towards improving peer review : Crowd-sourced insights from Twitter.
Peer review is an essential part of academic publishing, yet many authors, reviewers, and editors have reportedly encountered problems with the review process. Some scholars view peer-review as a necessary process for the advancement of science, while other scholars argue that for many publishers an...
| Institutions: | Monash University Durham University University of Melbourne Temple University Newcastle University |
|---|---|
| Asıl Yazarlar: | Allen, Kelly-Ann, Reardon, Jonathan, Lu, Yumin, Smith, David V., Rainsford, Emily, Walsh, Lucas |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice v.19 n.3 https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02
2022
|
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02 |
Benzer Materyaller
-
Humanising Peer Review with Artificial Intelligence : Paradox or Panacea?
Yazar:: Crawford, Joseph, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2024) -
Leadership, Learning and Teaching Practice in Higher Education : A 2016-2023 Bibliometric Review.
Yazar:: Adams, Donnie, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2024) -
The ecology of peer review : Person-centred, strength-based, and self-determination perspectives.
Yazar:: Allen, Kelly-Ann, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2022) -
Journalism capstone units : capstone units for journalism programs to facilitate the demonstration of graduate capabilities : final report.
Yazar:: Cullen, Trevor
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2019) -
Journalism, Media & Communication Network : Final Report.
Yazar:: Breit, Rhonda, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2015)