Towards improving peer review : Crowd-sourced insights from Twitter.
Peer review is an essential part of academic publishing, yet many authors, reviewers, and editors have reportedly encountered problems with the review process. Some scholars view peer-review as a necessary process for the advancement of science, while other scholars argue that for many publishers an...
| Institutions: | Monash University Durham University University of Melbourne Temple University Newcastle University |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | Allen, Kelly-Ann, Reardon, Jonathan, Lu, Yumin, Smith, David V., Rainsford, Emily, Walsh, Lucas |
| Udgivet: |
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice v.19 n.3 https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02
2022
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02 |
Lignende værker
-
Humanising Peer Review with Artificial Intelligence : Paradox or Panacea?
af: Crawford, Joseph, et al.
Udgivet: (2024) -
Leadership, Learning and Teaching Practice in Higher Education : A 2016-2023 Bibliometric Review.
af: Adams, Donnie, et al.
Udgivet: (2024) -
The ecology of peer review : Person-centred, strength-based, and self-determination perspectives.
af: Allen, Kelly-Ann, et al.
Udgivet: (2022) -
Journalism capstone units : capstone units for journalism programs to facilitate the demonstration of graduate capabilities : final report.
af: Cullen, Trevor
Udgivet: (2019) -
Journalism, Media & Communication Network : Final Report.
af: Breit, Rhonda, et al.
Udgivet: (2015)