Towards improving peer review : Crowd-sourced insights from Twitter.
Peer review is an essential part of academic publishing, yet many authors, reviewers, and editors have reportedly encountered problems with the review process. Some scholars view peer-review as a necessary process for the advancement of science, while other scholars argue that for many publishers an...
| Institutions: | Monash University Durham University University of Melbourne Temple University Newcastle University |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | Allen, Kelly-Ann, Reardon, Jonathan, Lu, Yumin, Smith, David V., Rainsford, Emily, Walsh, Lucas |
| منشور في: |
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice v.19 n.3 https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02
2022
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02 |
مواد مشابهة
-
Humanising Peer Review with Artificial Intelligence : Paradox or Panacea?
حسب: Crawford, Joseph, وآخرون
منشور في: (2024) -
Leadership, Learning and Teaching Practice in Higher Education : A 2016-2023 Bibliometric Review.
حسب: Adams, Donnie, وآخرون
منشور في: (2024) -
The ecology of peer review : Person-centred, strength-based, and self-determination perspectives.
حسب: Allen, Kelly-Ann, وآخرون
منشور في: (2022) -
Journalism capstone units : capstone units for journalism programs to facilitate the demonstration of graduate capabilities : final report.
حسب: Cullen, Trevor
منشور في: (2019) -
Journalism, Media & Communication Network : Final Report.
حسب: Breit, Rhonda, وآخرون
منشور في: (2015)