कवर छवि

The ecology of peer review : Person-centred, strength-based, and self-determination perspectives.

The peer-review system, commonly considered critical for research integrity and rigour, has been criticised for being slow, exclusionary and exploitive. Concerns include the high profits of academic publishers as well as the growing number of insecurely employed academic staff who report high levels...

पूर्ण विवरण

ग्रंथसूची विवरण
Institutions:Monash University
Durham University
University of Melbourne
University of Kansas
मुख्य लेखकों: Allen, Kelly-Ann, Reardon, Jonathan, Walsh, Lucas, Waters, Lea E., Wehmeyer, Michael L.
प्रकाशित: Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice v.19 n.5 https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.5.2 2022
विषय:
Career development
Peer evaluation
Self determination
Stress variables
Writing for publication
Academic staff publishing
Higher education
Early career academics
Person centred approach
Strengths-based approach
Socioecological approach
ऑनलाइन पहुंच:https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.5.2
विवरण
सारांश:The peer-review system, commonly considered critical for research integrity and rigour, has been criticised for being slow, exclusionary and exploitive. Concerns include the high profits of academic publishers as well as the growing number of insecurely employed academic staff who report high levels of stress and burnout. The consequence has been a decline in willing reviewers, publication delays, and potential damage to the career trajectories of early career researchers and PhD candidates at institutions that rely on metrics of academic impact as measures of academic performance. Rather than overhaul the system and undermine current benefits, this critical review adopts an ecological lens to posit an approach that is humanistic, transparent, and above all things, kind. This approach frames an applied perspective on how to improve peer-review moving forward. [Author abstract]
आईएसबीएन:


समान संसाधन