Towards improving peer review : Crowd-sourced insights from Twitter.
Peer review is an essential part of academic publishing, yet many authors, reviewers, and editors have reportedly encountered problems with the review process. Some scholars view peer-review as a necessary process for the advancement of science, while other scholars argue that for many publishers an...
| Institutions: | Monash University Durham University University of Melbourne Temple University Newcastle University |
|---|---|
| Những tác giả chính: | Allen, Kelly-Ann, Reardon, Jonathan, Lu, Yumin, Smith, David V., Rainsford, Emily, Walsh, Lucas |
| Được phát hành: |
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice v.19 n.3 https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02
2022
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02 |
Những quyển sách tương tự
-
Humanising Peer Review with Artificial Intelligence : Paradox or Panacea?
Bằng: Crawford, Joseph, et al.
Được phát hành: (2024) -
Leadership, Learning and Teaching Practice in Higher Education : A 2016-2023 Bibliometric Review.
Bằng: Adams, Donnie, et al.
Được phát hành: (2024) -
The ecology of peer review : Person-centred, strength-based, and self-determination perspectives.
Bằng: Allen, Kelly-Ann, et al.
Được phát hành: (2022) -
Journalism capstone units : capstone units for journalism programs to facilitate the demonstration of graduate capabilities : final report.
Bằng: Cullen, Trevor
Được phát hành: (2019) -
Journalism, Media & Communication Network : Final Report.
Bằng: Breit, Rhonda, et al.
Được phát hành: (2015)