Towards improving peer review : Crowd-sourced insights from Twitter.
Peer review is an essential part of academic publishing, yet many authors, reviewers, and editors have reportedly encountered problems with the review process. Some scholars view peer-review as a necessary process for the advancement of science, while other scholars argue that for many publishers an...
| Institutions: | Monash University Durham University University of Melbourne Temple University Newcastle University |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | Allen, Kelly-Ann, Reardon, Jonathan, Lu, Yumin, Smith, David V., Rainsford, Emily, Walsh, Lucas |
| Publicado em: |
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice v.19 n.3 https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02
2022
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02 |
Registos relacionados
-
Humanising Peer Review with Artificial Intelligence : Paradox or Panacea?
Por: Crawford, Joseph, et al.
Publicado em: (2024) -
Leadership, Learning and Teaching Practice in Higher Education : A 2016-2023 Bibliometric Review.
Por: Adams, Donnie, et al.
Publicado em: (2024) -
The ecology of peer review : Person-centred, strength-based, and self-determination perspectives.
Por: Allen, Kelly-Ann, et al.
Publicado em: (2022) -
Journalism capstone units : capstone units for journalism programs to facilitate the demonstration of graduate capabilities : final report.
Por: Cullen, Trevor
Publicado em: (2019) -
Journalism, Media & Communication Network : Final Report.
Por: Breit, Rhonda, et al.
Publicado em: (2015)