Towards improving peer review : Crowd-sourced insights from Twitter.
Peer review is an essential part of academic publishing, yet many authors, reviewers, and editors have reportedly encountered problems with the review process. Some scholars view peer-review as a necessary process for the advancement of science, while other scholars argue that for many publishers an...
| Institutions: | Monash University Durham University University of Melbourne Temple University Newcastle University |
|---|---|
| Hoofdauteurs: | Allen, Kelly-Ann, Reardon, Jonathan, Lu, Yumin, Smith, David V., Rainsford, Emily, Walsh, Lucas |
| Gepubliceerd in: |
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice v.19 n.3 https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02
2022
|
| Onderwerpen: | |
| Online toegang: | https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.3.02 |
Gelijkaardige items
-
Humanising Peer Review with Artificial Intelligence : Paradox or Panacea?
door: Crawford, Joseph, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2024) -
Leadership, Learning and Teaching Practice in Higher Education : A 2016-2023 Bibliometric Review.
door: Adams, Donnie, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2024) -
The ecology of peer review : Person-centred, strength-based, and self-determination perspectives.
door: Allen, Kelly-Ann, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2022) -
Journalism capstone units : capstone units for journalism programs to facilitate the demonstration of graduate capabilities : final report.
door: Cullen, Trevor
Gepubliceerd in: (2019) -
Journalism, Media & Communication Network : Final Report.
door: Breit, Rhonda, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2015)