Peer review of teaching for promotion purposes : a project to develop and implement a pilot program of external peer review of teaching at four Australian universities : final project report.
This project was concerned with developing the capacity within Australian universities to recognise, reward and promote quality teaching, and in so doing, improve the recognition of teaching within the culture of Australian universities. The project concluded that as universities across Australia de...
| Institutions: | University of Adelaide Griffith University University of Wollongong University of New South Wales |
|---|---|
| প্রধান লেখক: | , , , , , , , , , |
| প্রকাশিত: |
[Australian Learning & Teaching Council]
2009
|
| বিষয়গুলি: | |
| অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন: | /resources/PP6-46_Peer%20review%20of%20teaching%20for%20promotion%20purposes%20Adelaide%202009.pdf |
| সংক্ষিপ্ত: | This project was concerned with developing the capacity within Australian universities to recognise, reward and promote quality teaching, and in so doing, improve the recognition of teaching within the culture of Australian universities. The project concluded that as universities across Australia develop teaching-only positions and teaching-intensive career pathways, they also need to develop promotion processes that allow academics to be promoted on teaching grounds. The following recommendations were made: that a further project be established with a particular focus on the implementation of summative peer review systems and engagement with senior management and promotion committee members; that institutions which decide to implement the Summative Peer Review of Teaching program support it by appointing a designated Learning and Teaching expert on each promotion committee, and by giving promotion committee members professional development in the area of interpreting teaching-centred applications and peer review reports; that institutions which choose to implement the Summative Peer Review of Teaching program adapt it to suit their circumstances, rather than adopting it in its current form; that institutions which decide to implement the Summative Peer Review of Teaching program first implement the formative protocol for Internal Peer Review of Teaching, and run it for a year before implementing the summative protocols. This will give peer reviewers time to train, and candidates for promotion time to become accustomed to the processes and criteria involved; and that institutions which decide to implement the Summative Peer Review of Teaching program modify their promotion processes and criteria that relate to teaching as they adapt the peer review protocols and criteria, to ensure alignment and lead-in time for those wishing to engage in summative peer review of their teaching. |
|---|---|
| আইসবিএন: | 9780646522814 9780646522814 |
